Start your quiz below!
Disclaimer: The RIRQ+ is an educational, self-report screening tool. It does not provide a diagnosis, and it is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or injury.
Running is one of the simplest and most rewarding ways to stay fit — but it’s also one of the most injury-prone sports.
The Running Injury Risk Questionnaire (RIRQ+) was developed to help runners identify personal risk factors for overuse injuries before they strike in a way that is convenient and quick.
Unlike lab-based biomechanical or performance tests, the RIRQ+ focuses on the subjective side of running injury risk — the things you feel, do, and report that often predict injury long before pain starts.
🧩 What the RIRQ+ Measures
The RIRQ+ captures key self-reported factors linked to running injuries, including:
- Training load patterns – frequency, intensity, and progression
- Recovery habits – sleep quality, stress, and cross-training
- Injury history and recent pain or discomfort
- Footwear habits and training surface variety
By combining these responses, the tool provides an overall running injury risk score — categorized as Low, Moderate, or High.
It helps you (and your physiotherapist or coach) make smarter decisions about training volume, recovery balance, and when to strengthen before increasing mileage.
→ Click here to learn more about injuries you could be at risk for.
⚖️ What It Does Not Measure
The RIRQ+ is not a biomechanical or physiological test. It does not measures like:
- Muscle strength or joint range of motion
- Gait mechanics or running economy
- Bone density, VO₂ max, or tendon stiffness
Instead, it complements these objective tests by offering valuable subjective insight into the behaviors and perceptions that strongly predict running injury risk.
Think of it as the “conversation before the data” — the context that makes the numbers meaningful.
👟 What Your Score Means
Your score shows how likely you are to get a running injury.
- 🟢 Low Risk (0–18): You’re doing great. Keep your training steady and make sure you rest properly.
- 🟠 Medium Risk (19–25): You have a few signs that you might get injured if you’re not careful. Add some strength training, mobility, and recovery work.
- 🔴 High Risk (26+): You’re at a higher risk of injury. Slow down, rest more, and follow a structured strength, cross-training and recovery plan before adding more mileage.
In short — the higher your score, the more you should focus on getting stronger, recovering well, and training smarter.
🧠 Inspired by Research
The Running Injury Risk Questionnaire (RIRQ+) is based on well-known research in running and sports science. These studies shaped how we understand running injury risk and prevention:
- Kluitenberg et al. (2015): New runners who increase training too quickly are more likely to get injured. Different runner groups (novice, recreational, competitive) face different injury patterns.
- Clarsen et al. (2014): Introduced a questionnaire to help athletes report small issues early — before they become real injuries.
- Gabbett (2016): Both too little and too much training can lead to injury. The key is finding the right training load.
- Nielsen et al. (2014): Increasing weekly running distance too fast raises running injury risk.
- Charest & Grandner (2020): Poor sleep increases injury risk and slows recovery.
In short, tracking how you train, rest, and recover — even with simple self-report — helps spot problems early and stay injury-free. The RIRQ+ makes this quick and simple.
🏁 Why Assessing Running Injury Risk Matters
By using the RIRQ+, you can:
- Detect early warning signs of overload
- Guide safer training adjustments
- Reinforce good recovery habits
- Prioritize prevention over reaction
It’s a quick, research-inspired way to stay one step ahead of running injuries — and to keep your training consistent and sustainable.
About the Author
Daniel da Cruz is a licensed South African physiotherapist in Sandton, South Africa, who helps runners, athletes, and working professionals recover from injury and build lasting resilience, particularly when it comes to running injury risk.
With clinical experience in orthopaedic, sports, and musculoskeletal physiotherapy, Daniel combines evidence-based care with modern exercise science to deliver practical, research-driven results.
References
- Kluitenberg, B., van Middelkoop, M., Smits, D. W., Verhagen, E., Hartgens, F., Diercks, R., & van der Worp, H. (2015). The NLstart2run study: Incidence and risk factors of running-related injuries in novice runners. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 25(5), e515–e523. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12346
- Kluitenberg, B., van Middelkoop, M., Diercks, R., & van der Worp, H. (2015). What are the Differences in Injury Proportions Between Different Populations of Runners? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 45(8), 1143–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0331-x
- Clarsen, B., Rønsen, O., Myklebust, G., Flørenes, T. W., & Bahr, R. (2014). The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center questionnaire on health problems: a new approach to prospective monitoring of illness and injury in elite athletes. British journal of sports medicine, 48(9), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-092087
- Gabbett T. J. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?. British journal of sports medicine, 50(5), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788
- Nielsen, R. Ø., Parner, E. T., Nohr, E. A., Sørensen, H., Lind, M., & Rasmussen, S. (2014). Excessive progression in weekly running distance and risk of running-related injuries: an association which varies according to type of injury. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 44(10), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.5164
- Charest, J., & Grandner, M. A. (2020). Sleep and Athletic Performance: Impacts on Physical Performance, Mental Performance, Injury Risk and Recovery, and Mental Health. Sleep medicine clinics, 15(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsmc.2019.11.005
Leave a Reply